Oath of Office as prescribed in the Constitution - Article II, Section 1, Clause 8- states and repeated by President Elect Felon: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
WELKER: And this is the point, sir, about due process. The Constitution says every person, citizens and non-citizens, deserve due process. Why not push to have him come back, present all of that evidence in court, let a judge decide?PRESIDENT: Well, I’ll leave that to the lawyers, and I’ll leave that to the attorney general of the United States, because —
WELKER: But do you agree —
PRESIDENT:– they’re in it. You have to understand. I’m dealing with Russia and Ukraine. I’m dealing with China —
WELKER: And we’re going to talk about that.
PRESIDENT : I’m dealing with Iran. I’m dealing with Rwanda and the Congo who are fighting and we’re trying to get that one straightened out. And I think we have done that, did a great job. Nobody even talks about it, but I think we’re close to doing that. They’re looking like they’re going to maybe make a peace deal, which was — would be good. But I’m dealing with a lot of different things. I don’t know much about this gentleman other than I hear he’s an absolute not good person. And I have very capable legal people, John Sauer, as you know, and all top people. And I have to rely on that to interpret whatever is said by the Supreme Court. Now with that being said, I have tremendous respect for the Supreme Court. Look, three of the people are people I appointed.
WELKER: Right.
PRESIDENT: And I have great respect for the Supreme Court. And I would expect that the attorney general will be doing the right thing.
WELKER: Your secretary of state says everyone who’s here, citizens and non-citizens, deserve due process. Do you agree, Mr. President?
PRESIDENT: I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know.WELKER: Well, the Fifth Amendment says as much.
PRESIDENT: I don’t know. It seems — it might say that, but if you’re talking about that, then we’d have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials. We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Section 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
On the government website, Constitution Annotated, they address this issue thoroughly:
The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Supreme Court has held that this protection extends to all natural persons (i.e., human beings), regardless of race, color, or citizenship. The Court has also considered multiple cases about whether the word person includes artificial persons, meaning entities such as corporations. As early as the 1870s, the Court appeared to accept that the Clause protects corporations, at least in some circumstances. In the 1877 Granger Cases, the Court upheld various state laws without questioning whether a corporation could raise due process claims. In a roughly contemporaneous case arising under the Fifth Amendment, the Court explicitly declared that the United States equally with the States . . . are prohibited from depriving persons or corporations of property without due process of law. Subsequent decisions of the Court have held that a corporation may not be deprived of its property without due process of law. By contrast, in multiple cases involving the liberty interest, the Court has held that the Fourteenth Amendment protects the liberty of natural, not artificial, persons. Nevertheless, the Court has at times allowed corporations to raise claims not based on the property interest. For instance, in a 1936 case, a newspaper corporation successfully argued that a state law deprived it of liberty of the press.
A separate question concerns the ability of government officials to invoke the Due Process Clause to protect the interests of their office. Ordinarily, the mere official interest of a public officer, such as the interest in enforcing a law, does not enable him to challenge the constitutionality of a law under the Fourteenth Amendment. Moreover, municipal corporations lack standing to invoke the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment in opposition to the will of their creator, the state. However, the Court has acknowledged that state officers have an interest in resisting an endeavor to prevent the enforcement of statutes in relation to which they have official duties, even if the officials have not sustained any private damage. State officials may therefore ask federal courts to review decisions of state courts declaring state statutes, which [they] seek to enforce, to be repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment.
A. Girasimov/ Stalin & Voroshilov in the Kremlin - |
WELKER: What’s the price tag? Do you know?
PRESIDENT: Peanuts compared to the value of doing it. We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we’re going to celebrate it.
The first time, I had two things to do ‒ run the country and survive; I had all these crooked guys. And the second time, I run the country and the world.”
Witness: Judith Altmann



