Well, here we are again, at the lead in for Rosh HaShannah. Unlike secular New Year, this one is full to the scuppers with
rites and rituals, evaluation and introspection.
Sure, there are apples and honey, but fish heads? Here are
some of the traditional offerings on
a table:
1. Couscous with 7 vegetables: each tiny grain represents a blessing
and the seven vegetables are for the 7 days of creation.
2. A fish head is held up and a blessing recited: “May it be
God’s will that we will be the head and not the tail.”
3. Beets: in Hebrew beets are silka (סֶלֶק) which is related to the word saluk (סַלֵק) which
means remove. So you say, "May it be Your will that our adversaries
are removed."
4. Gourds: K'rah (קְרוֹא) in
Hebrew can mean proclaim, as in "May our merits be proclaimed before
G-d," but there's a homonym (קְרוֹעַ) that means to rip up, as in "May harsh decrees be torn
up."
I love the symbolism and the
pronouncements. Growing up, we did the usual apples and honey thing, but I learned about
the other customs from a variety of friends at whose table I sat. Every
family had its own version.
Which is one of the
things I appreciate about Judaism. There are a zillion versions of tradition,
even within a single community group. Sure, there are some groups that want to
impose their version on the rest of us, but they are the exceptions, not the
rule. And that's what worries me most about Israel. But you knew that. And I’m
not going there right now.
There are times when
religious practice needs to be accommodated, but any time someone tries to
restrict the rights of others using
the religion card, it's time for a reality check.
At every job interview I
have ever had, I have stated up front that I am a Sabbath observer and do not
work from sundown Friday until sundown Saturday night. If the job has a hard
requirement that work must be performed, I do not apply for that job. If there
are schedules that can be worked out, I do apply for the job. For years, I was the
"Sunday Person" in my department at Dayton's. And frankly, they were
happy to have someone who didn't complain about working on Sundays. For the
myriad Jewish holy days, I use vacation time, or unpaid time when there was
no vacation time available. Often, I have to work with HR to make sure I can
get the chagim (days with work prohibition,) but
it usually works itself out. In return, I volunteered to work Christmas
and Easter...and most certainly did when I became a travel agent in an office
that was open 24/7. When lunch is brought in, I always hope for a
non-meat/vegetarian option, but it doesn't always happen. But I'm not about to
tell anyone they can't have a pulled pork sandwich or pepperoni pizza because
my religion forbids those foods.
Get my drift?
However.
Clerk Kim Davis of
Kentucky is really pushing the envelope here. She has empowered herself not to declare her beliefs, but to deny
civil rights to people who don't see Biblical law the same way she does. The
question becomes: can her religious observance mesh with her
requirements of her job?
Eugene Volokh of the
Washington Post published an excellent piece explaining the law and the
Kentucky Clerk controversy: When does your religion legally excuse you from doing part
of your job? Mr. Volokh states that Ms. Davis' objection is
rooted in her name appearing on that legal document. Does having the clerk's
name on the document make a difference? That is the section of the law that Ms.
Davis should be appealing in STATE not Federal court. Is this a reasonable
accommodation…and is this what her argument is really about?
Religious observance is a
hugely slippery slope and the Federal government recognizes that. Instead of
further codifying the law, it allows for the application of reason in
accommodating religious observance. But that doesn't help much here.
Yes, the State of
Kentucky can amend their laws to remove the clerk's name from all applications,
and that, according to Ms. Davis' latest proclamations, will suffice. I don't
believe that for a New York minute. I think Ms. Davis and her supporters are
going for something much bigger....an establishment of religious practice that
will subvert the intention of the First Amendment.
I didn't think this at
first, but I do now. There are people in her support group likening her to
Martin Luther King. That's like comparing Ayatollah Khomeini to Martin Luther
King. There aren't enough electrons on the inter-web to fully discuss why that
is in no way, shape, or form even remotely close to the truth. Unlike Dr. King
who was fighting for civil rights,
Davis supporters are supporting the act of bigotry as an American value to prevent civil rights.
Refusing to authenticate
the eligibility of two adult humans...which is what her job is....is
not a simple religious freedom issue. No one is asking for her
approval/blessing on a union between two consenting adults. Her job is to
verify there are two age-appropriate adults standing in front of her. Her
refusal to recognize those adults is a civil intolerance issue, and as such,
has no place in a government office.
I won’t even mention Kim
Davis, Musical Marriage, and what her version of the Bible has to say about
that.
There was one other little thing
the Bible says that might be of importance this week in particular. It appears several times...in Exodus,
in Leviticus, and again in Deuteronomy. Here's my favorite version, Leviticus 19:33-34
33 When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not taunt him.34 The stranger who sojourns with you shall be as a native from among you, and you shall love him as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. I am the Lord, your God.
If
you think this is a hot potato now….just wait until the Syrian refugees ask for
asylum in the US. There’s your next GOP catfight.
Meanwhile, just so you know...Cancer Part One went well last Wednesday,and tomorrow is Part 2. I expect to be right as rain before the sun sets at the start of the holy day next Sunday, so count on a new episode on Sunday instead of Monday like usual. Okay?
Wifely Person's Tip of the Day....the Week...the Month
May you all be inscribed in the Book of Life
for a happy, healthy, and wondrous 5776!
She could have turned down this job that required her to do something that essentially caused her to go against the existing law. I have no sympathy for her.She belongs in jail for not observing the law under which she worked.Dina
ReplyDeleteBest wishes and strength for you on Part 2.
ReplyDelete