Well, I'm still sitting in my own kitchen, only marginally less pissed off than I was last week. This week, the Vikings played on Thursday night, and once again, the real Vikings showed up to play. They dropped their second game in a row after a spectacular start of 5 wins. The bright spot was that I didn't have to run out to the cemetery to see if Ziggy clawed his way out. Had they one either of the last two, that would've been necessary. Minnesota teams are choke teams.....they can only get so close.....except for the Lynx. We should be extraordinarily proud of the Lynx, and we are, quietly, because no one wants to put a makkes (a plague) on their season. Added to that, I couldn't watch the Chiefs' game because it wasn't "broadcast" in my area. After years of being a KC fan, for reasons I can't really explain except to say they have nothing to do with Travis Kelce, but getting Andy Reid for the coach was far more important. Big Red is good at team, something the Vikings haven't been good at since the days of the Purple People Eaters ...one of whom recently retired as a Minnesota Supreme Court Justice. But that's neither here nor there. The important thing with the Vikings is that being a prima donna does not make for good team work, which, in turn, loses games. Hiring washed up QBs and violent criminals does not help the image or the team. So while I sat quietly by while Ziggy had apoplexy during the games, I silently followed the Chiefs....long before Big Red, before Travis, and before anyone even knew what a Swiftie was.
The Duke of Flatbush |
Now, however, I'm having a conundrum: The World Series. Worse than a subway series, this one is tough. Met-Yankees woulda been a snap: Yankees all the way. But this one tugs at my little-girl heart. My bro is a Dodger guy and always has been. I've been more fickle. But truth be told, I do hold a soft spot for those boys from Brooklyn, the Trolley Dodgers. My American League loyalties are being sore tested at the moment. I suspect that it will be another win-win for me.
The famous BCJ Baseball t-shirt |
As terrible as it sounds, I am glad Dad isn't around now. This election would smash his heart to smithereens.
Dad spent most of World War II in a tank in Patton's army. He was a telegrapher and in rotation with General Patton. He was at the Bulge, he was at Remagen, he was even at the liberation of at least one concentration camp, called in to process survivors because he spoke both Yiddish and French. He fought Nazis and Fascism. He had a lot to say about Fascists of all types. We spent a whole lotta hours sitting in beach chairs at the club while he talked about the war. For the first time, according to Mom; I took notes as he told stories I never heard before. I watched my dad weep as he talked about the bodies in the villages, about the skeletal survivors in one of the camps, about the nightmares he still had decades later that prevented him from sleeping through the night. We didn't know much about PTSD until his medical interview at the Minnesota VA when they moved here for assisted living. That's a whole other story. But the bottom line was....and still is....he believed Fascism could happen anywhere, even in the US, if we forgot about what Fascism looked like in Europe.
Increasingly, the right wing of this country is moving into Fascism. This isn't being alarmist; this is the increasingly worried voices of people who know about this stuff. In an interview given to the New York Times, former Marine Corps General John Kelly, Feckless Felon's longest serving Chief-of-Staff said:
“Well, looking at the definition of fascism: It’s a far-right authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy,” he said.
Mr. Kelly said that definition accurately described Mr. Trump.
“So certainly, in my experience, those are the kinds of things that he thinks would work better in terms of running America,” Mr. Kelly said.
He added: “Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he’s certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators — he has said that. So he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure.”
Kelly said Trump chafed at limitations on his power.
“He certainly prefers the dictator approach to government,” Mr. Kelly said.
Mr. Trump “never accepted the fact that he wasn’t the most powerful man in the world — and by power, I mean an ability to do anything he wanted, anytime he wanted,” Mr. Kelly said.
Once upon a time, I had high hopes that Kelly would be that adult in the room. Appointed in July, 2017, it was announced on December 8, 2018 that he would be replaced by Mick Mulvaney. When I wrote the episode, It's Not A Coup, It's A Junta on August 28, 2017, I was already wondering about generals running the West Wing. I hoped they would be able to rein in the president and maybe bring a sense of import to foreign policy that was sorely lacking. Nah. No such luck. Still, hindsight can be very interesting because in the period following his removal, Kelly began sounding warning bells about the president. After the attack on the Capitol on January 6th, 2021, Kelly said he supported the removal of the president according to the 25th Amendment to the Constitution. Was he just a disgruntled, unemployed general...or was his possible junta thwarted?
It doesn't matter anymore. What does matter is that enough people who know what Fascism is all about are pointing fingers, attempting to draw attention to the actions of a candidate who is increasingly unhinged. His rally at Madison Square Garden was shockingly racist. Yeah, it was a comedian who called Puerto Rico a floating garbage island, but it was the audience that clapped and hooted. Yeah, yeah, the GOP tried to distance themselves from it, but they hired him knowing what his comedy is about. His reiteration of lies about FEMA and hurricane recovery are just destructive to the people who are being helped. CNN stepped away to their coverage to give anchor Jessica Dean a chance to fact-check. After the fact, CNN's Daniel Dale posted an in-depth analysis of 16 lies.
I'm going to stop now. You, gentle readers, all know this. It's not news. What happens on November 5th will impact all of us, one way or another, honorable behavior be damned. Which I think is unfortunate.
I remain especially concerned about November 6th. January 6th, 2021 was a trial run. We're about to experience the real thing.
The Wifely Person's Tip o'the Week
Citing cowardice, complicity, and lack of honor
on the part of Jeff Bezos,
over 200,000 subscribers have cancelled their
Washington Post subscriptions.
I am one of them.
If you have a subscription, you should be, too.
WP.
ReplyDeleteI am confused by the words “complicity” and “lack of honor” in your Tip O’ the Week. Are you inferring that Bezos is complicit in wanting DT elected, or that it would only be honorable to endorse KH? Anyone subscriber has the right to cancel, of course, but surely the WP has the right to sit out a contest where both candidates are clearly not fit for purpose?
Ed.
I chose words frequently used in the comments, editorials, and other outlets of expression I've been reading....from both sides. Personally, I believe the change in policy regarding the endorsement of a candidate was because the editorial board and staff had prepped the endorsement of Kamala Harris, not the Feckless Felon that Bezos supports. As an admitted advocate for the GOP, his instruction was seen as fear to publish what his board already indicated (and is now saying in their op ed pieces) lest he be "punished" by a candidate who often uses "loyalty tests" to root out staff and advisers with opinions that differ from his.
DeleteBezos' complicity in silencing the staff and displays a lack of honor in departing from the free-press traditions once held dear by the Washington Post is underscored by the paper's excellent track record in fact-checking and calling out all candidates on the lies and exaggerations.
To be sure, Mr. Bezos, as publisher, is well within his rights to quash anything he wants. His circus, his monkeys. But it doesn't mean the editorial board or the readers have to financially support his abandonment of shedding light on our democracy at work. The real issue, then, becomes whether or not the staff of the Washington Post is obligated to do as he instructs or to report with accuracy. It is well within their rights not to prevaricate or lie to their readers. One has to ask the question "If the board wanted to endorse Feckless Felon, would Bezos have allowed it?
In the end analysis, the curtain is drawn, hiding opinions of the editorial board, and the trust so necessary to reporting is lost.
After all, doesn't democracy die in darkness?