The ruling rejects a decision from a federal appeals court in February that found Trump enjoyed no immunity for alleged crimes he committed during his presidency to reverse the 2020 election results. The decision says presidents have immunity for official acts but not all acts are official, and lower courts must decide which acts qualify for each.
Crooks began firing two minutes and two seconds after the starting point of the newly published video, which begins with a man’s voice saying that people were pointing toward the roof, according to a Washington Post analysis of footage from the event. The shots began 86 seconds after the first audible attempts to alert police, according to the analysis, which synchronized several clips based on the sound of Trump’s voice over the public address system as he addressed supporters at a farm show grounds in Butler County, PA
[Follow the Washington Post link to see a video showing the gunman pointed out by spectators]
By luck or by God, many people are saying it’s by God I’m still here.
Today is not just some isolated incident. The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. That rhetoric led directly to President Trump's attempted assassination.
From Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.): “
Let’s be clear: This was an assassination attempt aided and abetted by the radical Left and corporate media incessantly calling Trump a threat to democracy, fascists, or worse.
Well of course they tried to keep him off the ballot, they tried to put him in jail and now you see this …
Donald Trump Jr.:
[It’s] not the time to be conspiratorial...there’s definitely questions...that need to be answered. We’ll let other people do all of that. I fear for him anyway, because you know, these attacks have been going on for quite some time. And that’s not just physical attacks, but it’s the verbiage that’s been going on about him — when we were ‘traitors’ and ‘criminals’ and ‘the greatest threat to democracy ever.’
Aileen Cannon |
A special prosecutor is a prosecutor who is independent of an office that would normally exercise jurisdiction in a criminal investigation—to avoid potential conflicts of interest or to facilitate subject matter area expertise. At the federal level, under 28 CFR § 600.1, a special prosecutor is referred to as a “special counsel,” and may be appointed by the attorney general to criminally investigate an individual or matter in cases where a Justice Department investigation would present a conflict of interest, or in other “extraordinary circumstances.” Under Supreme Court precedent in Morrison v. Olson, Congress may also appoint a special counsel through the passage of legislation. Notable special counsels in U.S. history include Ken Starr of the Clinton Whitewater investigation and Lawrence Walsh of the Iran-Contra Affair.
To rule as she did, Cannon had to sidestep longstanding Supreme Court precedent about independent prosecutors, which she decided was not precedent at all but instead mere “dictum” that need not be followed. This was precisely the path outlined by conservative Justice Clarence Thomas earlier this month in a decision regarding Trump’s prosecution for his role in the January 6 insurrection, where the constitutionality of the special counsel’s appointment was not even at issue.
None of the other Supreme Court justices signed onto Thomas’s concurring opinion, but Cannon cited it three times....
In United States v. Nixon, a 1973 decision, the Supreme Court rejected former President Richard Nixon’s attempts to stonewall a grand jury investigation into the Watergate break-in. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Nixon had to comply with the subpoena of a special prosecutor, who had been appointed in compliance with the Constitution, federal law, and regulation.
For decades, the Nixon ruling has been understood to affirm the constitutionality of independent prosecutors and special counsel who are appointed by the attorney general to handle certain politically sensitive cases. In 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed this understanding when it shot down a challenge to Robert Mueller’s appointment to investigate Russia’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.
The D.C. Circuit specifically rejected arguments that a key section in the Nixon decision was “dictum.”
But take a moment to time 86 seconds. That's a long time for inaction. Take a moment to review the raised fist Feckless gave the crowd after he rose from the platform. Take a moment to think like John le Carré. Or David Balducci. Or Tom Clancy. This could be one of their plots. The nefarious gang wants to make sure the candidate is quasi-deified. He can only do that if he escapes certain death. They find someone squeaky clean who needs a whole bunch of money. They hire him, knowing they're gonna kill him. Maybe he knows they're gonna take him out, and instructs them to pay his family. Or maybe he doesn't know. But the guy already has access to the assault weapon, goes off to buy 50 rounds of ammo (not very much, really) and positions himself as instructed. A cop gets up on the roof, but conveniently falls before the shooter can fire at him. He turns, fires, then deliberately misses the president, but manages to hit bystanders, killing one. Okay, plausible. The plot continues to unfold, the shooter is dead, the target is victorious in his miraculous escape, and no one ever knows about the deal. The convention takes place where he's hailed as blessed by God himself, and a saved martyr to their cause. Two days later, all the charges against him evaporate because a judge hands down a totally wacko decision which will probably be overturned, but NOT before the election. The Democrats are vociferously blamed, the general population is totally turned off, and it's the lowest voting turnout ever, thereby ensuring the miracle candidate's election.
The only thing I can't stand is referring to the Supreme Court and the Prseident's office as SCOTUS and POTUS and more They irritate me to no end.
ReplyDeleteWP. At the end of the day, it doesn’t really matter what ACTUALLY happened and when. As human beings, we are wired to find patterns, where there are none. No one wants to believe that life is random, because that’s too scary. That’s why we will always have religion and conspiracies. Ed,
ReplyDeleteBrilliant. Never thought of that one although I was somewhat familiar with Fairclough's story. Thank you for this!
ReplyDeletethe WP
I hope you are not done yet!
ReplyDeleteI was wondering if anyone would notice that.
Delete